EV Fires vs Gasoline Fires: Why Suppression Strategies Can’t Be the Same

Not all fires behave the same

A common assumption in fire safety is that a fire is a fire, and that similar suppression strategies will work regardless of the fuel source. That assumption breaks down when lithium-ion batteries are involved.

When comparing EV fire vs gasoline fire behavior, the difference is not just intensity; it’s the underlying failure mechanism. These differences matter when designing safety strategies for vehicles, charging infrastructure, parking structures, and energy storage systems.

---

Gasoline fires: external, fuel-limited events

Gasoline fires follow a relatively predictable pattern:

• Fuel is stored outside the ignition source

• Combustion depends heavily on ambient oxygen

• Once fuel is consumed, isolated, or covered, the fire subsides

Because of this, conventional suppression strategies are effective:

• Foam to isolate fuel

• Oxygen displacement

• Water for cooling and control

The fire is driven by external fuel availability.

---

EV Fire vs Gasoline Fire: Internally Driven vs Fuel-Limited Failures

While gasoline fires depend on external fuels, lithium-ion battery failures are internally chemical events.

In lithium-ion batteries:

• Energy is stored inside sealed cells

• Failure generates heat, gas, and ignition risk internally

• Fuel is created during the failure itself

EV fires are typically the result of thermal runaway, a self-heating chemical chain reaction that produces flammable OFF-GAS before visible flames appear.

This means:

• Suppressing visible flames does not stop fuel generation

• Re-ignition is common if internal reactions continue

• Fire behavior is governed by chemistry, not just combustion

👉 For a deeper explanation of this process, see Thermal Runaway Explained and Battery OFF-GAS Explained.

---

Temperature: why EV fires burn hotter

Lithium-ion battery fires can reach significantly higher temperatures than gasoline fires due to internal chemical reactions.

Gasoline fires typically burn at temperatures governed by fuel combustion in open air.

EV battery fires, by contrast, can reach much higher internal temperatures as exothermic chemical reactions accelerate inside battery cells. This heat is not dependent on external oxygen and can continue to build even after visible flames are suppressed.

Higher temperatures mean:

• Faster material degradation

• Increased risk to surrounding structures

• Greater challenge for conventional suppression systems

---

Duration: minutes versus hours

EV battery fires can last hours due to ongoing internal reactions, while gasoline fires are typically extinguished in minutes.

Gasoline fires are typically resolved once the fuel source is removed or isolated.

EV battery fires can burn for hours because:

• Thermal runaway may continue inside the pack

• Cells may fail sequentially rather than all at once

• Residual heat can trigger delayed re-ignition

This prolonged behavior places sustained demands on emergency response and facility safety systems.

---

Suppression demands: why cooling alone is not enough

EV battery fires often require significantly more water and longer cooling times compared to gasoline fires.

Water plays an important role in cooling battery fires, but the scale is fundamentally different.

EV battery incidents may require:

• Extremely large volumes of water

• Prolonged application over many hours

• Direct access to battery packs, which is often limited

Cooling can reduce temperature, but it does not neutralize OFF-GAS already released, nor does it stop internal chemical reactions if thermal runaway continues.

---

Toxic emissions: a hidden safety risk

Lithium-ion battery fires can release complex and hazardous gas mixtures during thermal runaway.

EV battery fires can produce complex mixtures of:

• Flammable gases

• Toxic byproducts

• Irritating and corrosive compounds

These emissions pose additional risks to:

• First responders

• Facility occupants

• Confined or enclosed environments

Not all smoke is equal — and battery fire emissions require different safety considerations.

---

Propagation: why one cell rarely stays isolated

In gasoline fires, spread depends on external fuel pathways.

In battery systems:

• Heat transfers directly between adjacent cells

• OFF-GAS ignition accelerates temperature rise

• A single cell failure can escalate into full pack involvement

This built-in propagation risk is why battery fire mitigation must focus on early-stage intervention, not just visible flame suppression.

---

Why EV fires often re-ignite

Re-ignition is uncommon in gasoline fires once fuel is removed.

In EV battery incidents, re-ignition occurs because:

• Thermal runaway may not be fully terminated

• Residual heat continues internal reactions

• OFF-GAS may be released after suppression appears successful

This behavior explains why EV fires can reignite hours — or even days — later.

---

The critical takeaway

EV battery fires are not fuel-limited fires.They are internally driven chemical failures.

That difference explains why:

• Conventional suppression strategies struggle

• Cooling alone is often insufficient

• Early intervention before OFF-GAS dominates is critical

Understanding this distinction is essential for modern EV and energy storage safety planning.